Use multiple methods to gather more data, deepen your analysis and develop a stronger contribution case. Contribution Analysis is part of a family of evaluation approaches called theory-based evaluations. 2008, p. 1-4). Mayne: Contribution analysis: Coming of age? What is Contribution Analysis? Contribution analysis report should not be considered as unconditional proof, but instead should be considered as evidence and root of cause from which managers can extract a result that the project has added a significant contribution to the monitored outcome (Mayne J. See for example Hudson, Mayne and Thomlison (1992), Freeman and In addition, several reviews of the … Coryn et al. Contribution analysis (CA) is an evaluation method developed by Mayne (2001) that helps users arrive at conclusions regarding the contribution that programmes have made to particular outcomes. Questions of cause and effect are critical to assessing the performance of programmes and projects. Google Scholar (Mayne, 2012, p.273) Three levels of contribution analysis Mayne (2008) observes that there are three levels of Contribution analysis (CA), a theory-based approach to evaluation, holds promise under these conditions of complexity. Six important steps to create a powerful contribution analysis Yet applications of CA for this purpose are limited, and methods are needed to strengthen contribution claims and ensure CA is practical to implement. A couple of posts ago I reported on a study on rates of return to research.One of the main challenges identified by the author was the attribution problem -which could be re-interpreted as the contribution problem. CA uses a theory of change (Mayne 1999, Morton 2012) to show how a programme is intended to work and the projected impacts of its production. The purpose of contribution analysis is to answer the following question: In light of the multiple factors influencing a result, has the intervention (initiative) made a noticeable contribution to an observed result and in what way? analysis of the data gathered, performance measurement is characterized by regular and often more straightforward measurement of aspects of a program’s performance. Mayne, John. (2010) review practice with theory-based evaluation approaches over the past decade, and White and Phillips (2012) review a number of ‘small n’ approaches to evaluation. Mayne, J (2001) Addressing attribution through contribution analysis: using performance measures sensibly. Contribution analysis: An approach to exploring cause and effect. We applied Mayne's six steps to CA and Lemire et al. The theory of Contribution Analysis (CA) as a method of evaluating complex programs has been written about extensively and has evolved considerably since it was first introduced by John Mayne in 1999. CORE RESOURCE A core resource is John Mayne’s 2001 paper on contribution analysis as an approach for exploring cause and effect. This brief note by John Mayne for ILAC provides an approach to address this challenge. Revisiting Contribution Analysis John Mayne Abstract: h e basic ideas behind contribution analysis were set out in 2001. Contribution analysis: An approach to exploring cause and effect When it is not practical to design an experiment to assess performance, contribution analysis can provide credible assessments of cause and effect. Most theory-based approaches rely on developing a theory of change, a logical model for an inter- Since then, interest in the approach has grown and contribution analysis has been opera­ tionalized in diferent ways. 271 techniques. Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation 16(1): 1 – 24 . It is part of a broader family of evaluation approaches known as theory-based (or theory-driven) evaluation (e.g. Performance indicators are used to track performance and feedback information to 3 The literature here is vast.